A little perspective, maybe, on yesterday's Profanity Monday post.
Mercy and justice. Hand in hand, right? Two necessary sides of the same coin? But we end up most often segregating ourselves into camps around only one, and generally on terms of reaction against the other. It ends up being Pat Robertson versus Jim Wallis - in the interests of rational discourse, i'm going to leave Jesse Jackson out of this - and the thought of a winner makes me cringe.
I spent the last several years of my life working with an organization called
Mercy Ships. The emphasis, as you might expect, was on the compassion side of things. And it was good. You can't run a ship with an all-volunteer crew paying their own way from forty different countries and spend your time on debating the finer points of premillenialism. Not when you're spending your days seeing what we were seeing. (See it thru a ship's photographer's eyes
here.) As far as i know, it's never yet occurred to anyone to try counting the number of Christian denominations represented on board any of the ships. No one cares.
In the same vein, when we were in Honduras or Haiti or The Gambia, no one was going ashore smacking the locals in the face with Why They Were Going To Hell Right Now if they didn't subscribe to precisely the right blend of Mississippi-steeped fundamentalism (conference of 1849, thank you,
not 1871). Instead, they healed the sick. They gave sight to the blind. They made new legs for amputees and brought joy to the shame-filled and guilt-ridden. They brought a cup of cool water - or an entire well of it - to the thirsty. To borrow Don Stephens' well-worn talking points, if they haven't yet figured out how to raise the dead, it's not for lack of trying. These are the things Jesus did. But they're not the only things Jesus did.
When i read about his life (er, Jesus, that is, not Don Stephens), i see nothing but heartbroken compassion for the humble and beaten-down. But for the proud, smug in their certainties, i see nothing in his words but brutal indictments and point-blank fury. It was all about attitude. He showed each in turn the other side of the coin, and he could flip it instantly. Mercy and justice, whichever was needed - though not, as we would speak of it, whichever was deserved. That's the problem: in ultimate terms, no one really deserves the mercy side. (We like to think so, but then you just wind up with what most people think of as religion - vaguely hoping their good stuff will outweigh their bad, and never really knowing for sure.)
Judging from that, naturally, it seems smart to be humble. Not only to stay on the safe side of all that, but also because try as we might, we never seem to be able to guess perfectly on when to show each other the mercy side of things and when to smack each other with the justice. And because sometimes, deaf to the one we need the most, we can only hear in terms of the other. I have a friend right now like that. Is it "cheap grace" to speak to her only of mercy while she's half killing herself with preventable wrongs? Not if it's the perverted ghosts of justice that are haunting her, driving her farther away.
So is this all just stating the obvious? Sure. (But you've read this far. Ha.) I guess it just highlights the same old problem above: Although God doesn't, we separate. Mercy
versus justice. Compassion versus truth. So how are we supposed to talk? Dunno. I guess that's why we often don't anymore, especially in a culture of increasingly totalitarian Tolerance. But in any case, i always seem to just end up indulging in the same old college-level idealism when i get to this point. It's a little embarrassing, really, on the face of it. But not underneath. Laugh all you want (i do), but the more things real life beats into and out of me, the more i return to the same old need for
love. Not the dreamy "all-you-need-is" kind. The God kind, the practice, the driving force; the hardest, gentlest thing in the world. Cuz in the end, we can't pull it off - this, or anything. In daily terms - to state the obvious again - none of us "needs" only mercy or justice, because none of us
has only one or the other. And none of us has much of anything, in the end, without the thing that bears both.
Don't all comment at once.
Ha.